All
Directory
Free
Sales Qualification Framework Directory
A single, searchable reference of the qualification methodologies used across B2B sales: what each acronym stands for, where it came from, and which deal shape it fits, so you stop forcing the wrong framework onto the wrong deal.
How to use it
Ctrl+F the acronym or deal type you're dealing with, check the Best Fit and Watch-Outs columns before adopting a framework wholesale, and use the decision guide to pick between close contenders like MEDDIC vs. MEDDPICC.
What's inside
- BANT, the original 1950s-60s IBM checklist
- MEDDIC, enterprise SaaS standard from PTC
- MEDDPICC, MEDDIC extended for procurement + competition
- ANUM, authority-first reordering of BANT
- FAINT, funds/interest model for modern value selling
- CHAMP, challenge-first alternative to BANT
- SPICED, Winning by Design's SaaS framework
- N.E.A.T. Harris Consulting Group's impact-led model
- GPCTBA/C&I, HubSpot's inbound qualification model
- SCOTSMAN, UK enterprise/competitive-bid framework
- PACT, outbound/ICP-driven qualification model
- Decision guide: which framework fits which deal shape
Every major qualification methodology in one table, plus how to choose between close contenders.
| Framework | Stands For | Origin / Source | Best Fit | Watch-Outs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BANT | Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline | Developed internally at IBM (1950s-60s) as a simple rep checklist | Transactional deals, top-of-funnel SDR qualification, short cycles | Budget-first framing assumes budget exists before value is shown; too linear for multi-stakeholder deals |
| MEDDIC | Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion | Created by Jack Napoli and Dick Dunkel at PTC (Parametric Technology Corporation) in the early 1990s; widely taught via MEDDIC Academy | Complex, multi-stakeholder enterprise deals with long cycles | Heavy for SMB motions; only pays off with disciplined CRM hygiene |
| MEDDPICC | MEDDIC + Paper Process, Competition | Extension of MEDDIC popularized by enterprise sales methodology consultancies (e.g. Force Management-adjacent practices) | Enterprise deals with heavy procurement/legal friction and known competitive pressure | Easy to confuse with "MEDDICC" (Competition added, no separate Paper Process): confirm which variant your org actually uses |
| ANUM | Authority, Need, Urgency, Money | Informal reordering of BANT that emerged in sales training circles to fix BANT's budget-first weakness | Deals where confirming the right decision-maker matters more upfront than budget | Still checklist-shaped; doesn't address multi-threading |
| FAINT | Funds, Authority, Interest, Need, Timing | Attributed to the modern sales enablement community (popularized via InsightSquared-adjacent training) as a response to buyers creating budget after they see value | Value-led selling motions where budget is fluid rather than pre-allocated | "Funds" is softer than "Budget": requires more rep judgment to qualify accurately |
| CHAMP | Challenges, Authority, Money, Prioritization | Popularized by InsightSquared as a challenge-first alternative to BANT | Consultative/solution selling where uncovering the problem earns the right to discuss budget | Prioritization stage is easy to skip under time pressure: don't let it become CHAM |
| SPICED | Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event, Decision | Developed by Winning by Design as part of their revenue architecture methodology | SaaS/subscription motions: new business, expansion, and renewal | "Critical Event" requires real discovery discipline to surface; easy to fake with a soft "end of quarter" answer |
| N.E.A.T. | Need, Economic Impact, Access to Authority, Timeline | Developed by The Harris Consulting Group with Sales Hacker as a modern, need-first alternative to BANT | Value/impact-led selling where quantifying economic impact matters more than an early budget check | Requires reps comfortable with financial/ROI conversations early |
| GPCTBA/C&I | Goals, Plans, Challenges, Timeline, Budget, Authority, Negative Consequences, Positive Implications | Built by HubSpot for their inbound sales methodology | Inbound-led motions and PLG-adjacent SaaS with self-educated leads | Longest acronym in the directory: teams often only use the first four letters in practice |
| SCOTSMAN | Solution, Competition, Originality, Timescale, Size, Money, Authority, Need | Used heavily in UK enterprise/complex sales training (IT, telecom) | Competitive enterprise bids needing explicit differentiation and competitive tracking | Dense: best used as a deal-review framework rather than a live-call script |
| PACT | Pain, Authority, Consequence, Target Profile | Associated with modern outbound-era sales methodology writers building for engagement-heavy prospecting motions | Outbound SDR qualification where ICP fit matters as much as pain | "Target Profile" needs a well-defined ICP to be useful, weak without one |
Which Framework Fits Which Deal, Decision Guide
| If your deal is... | Start with |
|---|---|
| Short cycle, single decision-maker, transactional | BANT or ANUM |
| Long cycle, multiple stakeholders, enterprise | MEDDIC or MEDDPICC |
| Competitive bid with formal procurement | SCOTSMAN or MEDDPICC |
| SaaS/subscription, land-and-expand motion | SPICED |
| Inbound-led, buyer already self-educated | GPCTBA/C&I |
| Value-led, budget created rather than pre-existing | N.E.A.T. or FAINT |
| Outbound-heavy, ICP-driven prospecting | PACT |
| Consultative, problem-first selling culture | CHAMP |
Notes on Sourcing
Where a framework's origin is well-documented (BANT/IBM, MEDDIC/PTC, GPCTBA/HubSpot, SPICED/Winning by Design, N.E.A.T./Harris Consulting Group), that's stated directly. Where attribution is contested or informally evolved across the industry (ANUM, FAINT, CHAMP, SCOTSMAN, PACT), that's flagged, search the named organization or consultancy directly for their current published materials rather than relying on a single secondary source.