Sales Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) Template
A skill-anchored PIP structure that documents the specific competency gap, the support already provided, and the measurable bar for success — not just a formal warning — while staying structured enough to hold up as fair, documented process.
What's inside
- Legal disclaimer & how to adapt it
- Header fields
- Section 1 — Performance concern summary
- Section 2 — Named competency gaps with evidence log
- Section 3 — Support & resources provided
- Section 4 — Measurable success criteria (SMART goals)
- Section 5 — Timeline & check-in schedule
- Section 6 — Consequences of not meeting the bar
- Section 7 — Acknowledgment & signatures
- Weekly/biweekly check-in log table
Before you use this: This template is a communication and documentation structure, not legal advice. PIP requirements vary by jurisdiction, employment classification, and company policy — have HR and/or employment counsel review before issuing any PIP. The value of this template is in forcing specificity: a PIP that names a skill, shows the evidence, and states a measurable bar holds up far better — for the company and for the rep — than a vague warning letter.
Header
- Employee name:
- Role / Title:
- Manager name:
- HR partner (if applicable):
- PIP start date:
- PIP review date(s):
- PIP end date:
Section 1 — Performance Concern Summary
State the gap between expected and actual performance in measurable terms. Avoid characterizations ("bad attitude," "not a team player") — state what was measured.
Example: "Quota attainment has been below 70% for the trailing two quarters (Q1: 64%, Q2: 61%), against a team average of 91% over the same period."
Performance concern (fill in): _________________________________________________
Measured against (target/benchmark): _________________________________________________
Time period this reflects: _________________________________________________
Section 2 — Named Competency Gaps (With Evidence)
This is the section that separates a fair PIP from a paper trail built to justify a decision already made. Name the actual skill(s) behind the performance gap — not the outcome, the cause.
| Named competency gap | Observed evidence (date, source, specific instance) | Impact on outcome |
|---|---|---|
| e.g., Discovery — doesn't uncover business impact before proposing | Ride-along 03/12: rep proposed solution before asking a single impact question | Deals stall at proposal stage; win rate on discovery-skipped deals is half the team average |
Evidence sources to draw from: ride-along notes, CRM/pipeline data, call recordings, prior 1:1 documentation, the Coaching Effectiveness Scorecard's Skill-Linkage criterion, the Sales Skills Self-Assessment (compare rep's self-rating to observed reality).
Section 3 — Support & Resources Provided
A PIP must show the company met its obligation to support improvement, not just document failure. List everything provided or committed to during this period.
- Increased coaching cadence: ___ hours/week (see Sales Coaching Cadence Calculator for the recommended allocation at this attainment level)
- Ride-alongs/shadowing scheduled: ___ per week
- Specific training/resource assigned: _________________________________________________
- Peer mentor or shadowing partner assigned: _________________________________________________
- Tools/access provided: _________________________________________________
- Manager availability commitment: _________________________________________________
Section 4 — Measurable Success Criteria (SMART Goals)
State the bar in numbers the rep can track themselves, without waiting to be told whether they're on pace.
| Success criterion | Metric | Target | Measured by |
|---|---|---|---|
| e.g., Discovery skill applied consistently | % of observed calls with 2+ impact questions before proposing | 90% by day 45 | Ride-along checklist score |
| e.g., Pipeline attainment | Quota attainment | 85%+ | CRM report, 30/60/90-day marks |
Section 5 — Timeline & Check-In Schedule
- Day 30 review date: _______ — Focus: is the named skill showing up at all in observed behavior?
- Day 60 review date: _______ — Focus: is the skill showing up consistently, is attainment trending up?
- Day 90 / final review date: _______ — Focus: has the measurable bar in Section 4 been met?
| Check-in date | Attended by | Skill progress noted | Attainment/metric update | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Section 6 — Consequences of Not Meeting the Bar
State plainly, without ambiguity, what happens at each review point if the criteria in Section 4 are not met. Have HR/legal confirm this language matches company policy and jurisdiction requirements before it's issued.
"If the success criteria in Section 4 are not met by [final review date], [company name] may proceed to further action, up to and including termination of employment, consistent with company policy."
Section 7 — Acknowledgment & Signatures
"I acknowledge that I have received and reviewed this Performance Improvement Plan. My signature confirms I have read and understand the concerns, the support being provided, and the success criteria described above. It does not necessarily indicate agreement with the plan's contents."
- Employee signature / date: _________________________________________________
- Manager signature / date: _________________________________________________
- HR signature / date (if applicable): _________________________________________________
Employee comments (optional, attach separately if more space is needed): _________________________________________________
How to use it
Have HR/legal review the framing and consequence language before issuing; complete Sections 1-4 collaboratively where possible (or at minimum, walk through them verbally with the rep) so the plan reads as a fair, specific bar rather than a formality on the way to a decision already made.