Rep-to-Manager Readiness Assessment
An 18-statement self-assessment that scores the competency shift from carrying a number to developing other people's numbers, before you make the leap into management.
What's inside
- 18 self-scored statements across 8 management-readiness competencies
- The 1-5 Likert scoring key
- The total-score banding (Ready Now / Ready With Support / Developing / Not Yet)
- Section-level reading instructions — why total score alone can mislead
- Specific follow-up actions for each low-scoring section
Purpose
Promoting your best rep into management is a competency change, not a reward. This assessment scores the specific shift — from carrying your own number to developing other people's numbers — across eight competencies, before you make the leap.
How to Take It
Score yourself 1-5 on each statement (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Be honest — this is a planning tool, not a test to pass. Where possible, have your own manager score you independently on the same statements and compare.
Section 1: Coaching Ability (vs. Doing It Yourself)
- When I see a teammate struggling on a call, my instinct is to ask questions that help them find the answer, not to take over and solve it for them. ___
- I can watch someone else make a mistake I know how to avoid, and let them work through it if the stakes allow it. ___
- I've successfully taught a skill to a peer before, and they improved because of it (not just because I helped once). ___
Section 2: Letting Go of "The Number" as Personal Identity
- I can imagine hitting team targets through others' performance and feeling as satisfied as hitting my own quota personally. ___
- When a teammate wins a deal I would have run differently, I can recognize it as a legitimate win rather than needing it done "my way." ___
- I don't need to be the best performer in the room to feel confident in my value. ___
Section 3: Skill Diagnosis (Seeing the Skill Behind the Outcome)
- When a deal is lost, I can usually name which specific skill gap contributed, not just "bad luck" or "the timing was wrong." ___
- I can watch or listen to someone else's call and identify one specific, teachable moment — not just an overall impression. ___
Section 4: Difficult Conversations
- I've delivered hard feedback to a peer (not just a friend) and it didn't damage the relationship. ___
- I can hold someone accountable to a commitment without either avoiding the conversation or becoming confrontational. ___
Section 5: Process & Metrics Literacy
- I understand what drives our forecast beyond my own deals — I could explain team pipeline health to a leader above me. ___
- I'm comfortable with the administrative and reporting layer of the job (forecasting, 1:1 documentation, hiring paperwork) even though it's not "selling." ___
Section 6: Motivating People Different From Me
- I can name at least one teammate whose motivation style is meaningfully different from mine, and describe what actually moves them. ___
- I don't assume what worked for me will work for everyone I'd manage. ___
Section 7: Time Reallocation
- I've already voluntarily spent time helping teammates improve, even when it didn't help my own number, without being asked. ___
- I can imagine spending the majority of my week in other people's deals and calls rather than my own, and find that appealing rather than draining. ___
Section 8: Hiring & Talent Judgment
- I have a clear point of view on what "good" looks like at this role beyond just quota attainment — I could describe it in specific, behavioral terms. ___
- I've had a real hand in interviewing or evaluating a candidate before, and my read on them turned out to be accurate. ___
Scoring
Add all 18 scores. Maximum: 90.
| Total Score | Band | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| 76-90 | Ready Now | Strong signal across all eight areas. Proceed to a management trial (e.g. lead a peer-coaching pod or new-hire buddy assignment) before the formal promotion. |
| 60-75 | Ready With Support | Real strengths, but 1-2 specific gaps. Identify the lowest-scoring section(s) and build a 60-90 day development plan (pair with a current manager as a shadow) before promoting. |
| 40-59 | Developing | The instinct may be there but the competencies aren't proven yet. Consider a stretch assignment (mentoring one new hire, running one skill-focus 1:1 rotation for a peer under supervision) rather than a full promotion. |
| Below 40 | Not Yet | This is very likely a "great IC, not yet a manager" profile — and that's fine. Not everyone's growth path runs through management. Consider a Senior IC or specialist track instead. |
Section-Level Read (do this regardless of total score)
Look at your three lowest-scoring sections specifically — total score can mask a real, specific gap. A 78 total with a 4/15 on Section 7 (Time Reallocation) is not actually "ready now" — it's a rep who scores well everywhere except the part of the job that's most different from their current one.
What To Do With a Low Section Score
- Coaching Ability low → Give them an informal coaching assignment now (buddy a new hire, run a skill-focus session for a peer under your supervision) and rescore in 90 days.
- Letting Go of the Number low → This is worth a direct conversation about what management actually replaces, not just adds — some reps want the title without wanting the tradeoff, and that's better surfaced now.
- Skill Diagnosis low → Have them shadow you scoring calls with the Call Coaching Observation Scorecard for a month before promotion.
- Difficult Conversations low → Practice with role-play before the stakes are real — this is one of the highest-cost gaps to discover after the promotion, not before.
How to use it
Score yourself honestly on all 18 statements, have your manager score you independently, compare the two, and read your lowest sections as closely as your total — then use the 'what to do' actions to close the specific gap before the promotion, not after.