Manager's Guide to Running MEDDIC Deal Reviews
A structured 30-minute deal review agenda and 20-question bank built to force evidence out of a rep instead of a status update.
What's inside
- 24-hour pre-work snapshot template (5-sentence limit, one line per MEDDIC element)
- 30-minute timeboxed agenda across 6 segments
- 20-question bank across Metrics / Economic Buyer / Criteria-Process / Pain-Champion
- Red-flag 'stop the meeting' list
- 4 manager redirect phrases to break status-update mode
- Post-review action-tracking template
- Review cadence rules by deal stage and size
Why most deal reviews fail
A deal review that asks "what's the latest?" gets an activity report: calls made, emails sent, a demo scheduled. None of that tells you whether the deal is real. The fix isn't a longer meeting — it's a different question set. This guide gives you the pre-work, the agenda, and the exact questions that force a rep to produce evidence, not narrative.
Pre-work (due 24 hours before the review, not read live)
Rep submits, per deal under review, one paragraph maximum per MEDDIC element — five sentences total. If a rep can't fill in a line, that's the finding; don't let them use the live meeting to improvise an answer they haven't actually got.
Deal Review Snapshot Template
- Metrics: ______________________________
- Economic Buyer: ______________________________
- Decision Criteria: ______________________________
- Decision Process: ______________________________
- Identify Pain: ______________________________
- Champion: ______________________________
- Competition: ______________________________
- Risk / what could kill this deal: ______________________________
The 30-minute structure
| Time | Segment | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| 0–3 min | Snapshot read, not explained | Rep reads their pre-submitted snapshot aloud, verbatim. No elaboration yet. |
| 3–8 min | Metrics interrogation | Manager tests whether the number is real, whose number it is, and whether it's been confirmed with the buyer. |
| 8–13 min | Economic Buyer / access | Manager tests whether the EB has been met, heard directly (not secondhand), and whether there's a plan to reach them if not. |
| 13–18 min | Decision Criteria & Process | Manager tests whether criteria are ranked, whether the process has named steps/dates, and whether it's been validated with more than one person. |
| 18–23 min | Champion strength test | Manager tests whether the "champion" has taken independent action, or just said nice things. |
| 23–27 min | Competition & risk | Manager tests what could kill the deal and whether the rep has a plan for it. |
| 27–30 min | Actions | One or two concrete actions, each with an owner and a date, logged before the meeting ends. |
Question bank (use these verbatim — they're built to resist "happy ears" answers)
Metrics
- "What's the number, in the buyer's own words, and who told you that?"
- "Has this number been validated with anyone above your champion?"
- "What happens to that number if this project doesn't happen?"
- "Is that a hard number or a rep estimate dressed up as their number?"
- "What did they say when you read that number back to them?"
Economic Buyer
- "Have you personally spoken with the economic buyer, or is this secondhand from your champion?"
- "What did the economic buyer say, in their own words, about priority or budget?"
- "If your champion left tomorrow, do you have another path to the economic buyer?"
- "What does the economic buyer care about that's different from what your champion cares about?"
- "When's the next time you're scheduled to be in front of them?"
Decision Criteria & Decision Process
- "What are the criteria, ranked — not listed, ranked?"
- "Who set those criteria, and has anyone tried to change them since?"
- "Walk me through every step between today and a signed contract, with names attached to each step."
- "What does legal/security/procurement review look like here, and has it started?"
- "Where does this stall if it stalls — which step, and why?"
Identify Pain & Champion
- "What did the champion do this week that only a real champion would do?"
- "Has the champion introduced you to anyone else in the organization unprompted?"
- "What's the cost of this pain in dollars, not adjectives?"
- "If the champion disappeared tomorrow, does this deal survive?"
- "What's the one thing you're afraid to ask this buyer? Why haven't you asked it?"
Red flags — stop the meeting when you hear these
- Rep answers with an activity ("I sent them the proposal") when asked a qualification question ("what are their decision criteria")
- Rep quotes their own assumption back as if the buyer said it ("they're definitely going with us")
- "Champion" has never taken an action the rep didn't ask for
- Close date has moved and the stated reason is vague ("just some internal stuff")
- Same rep, same phrasing, across multiple deals — a sign the language is memorized, not real
Manager redirect phrases
- "Stop — that's an activity update. Tell me what the economic buyer actually said about budget."
- "Whose number is that — yours or theirs?"
- "You've told me what you did. Tell me what they did."
- "If I called your champion right now, what would they say if I asked them who else needs to sign off?"
Post-review actions template
| Deal | Gap identified | Action | Owner | Due date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cadence
- Deals in current-quarter forecast, above your team's average deal size: weekly.
- Earlier-stage deals: biweekly.
- Any deal moved into Commit or Best Case for the first time: reviewed within 48 hours, off-cycle if needed — new forecast claims get tested immediately, not on the regular calendar.
How to use it
Have reps submit the one-paragraph-per-element snapshot 24 hours before the review, run the timeboxed agenda live, and close every review with a logged action, owner, and date.