First 90 Days as a Sales Leader Checklist

Rule of the first 90 days: you are not hired to have opinions in week 2. You are hired to make the right changes in month 3, backed by evidence the team already half-agrees with. Every checklist item below exists to stop you from fixing the wrong thing fast.

---

Phase 1 — Days 1-30: Listen & Audit

Do not change anything structural in this phase. Your only job is to build an accurate picture and earn the right to change things later.

Data & systems audit

• Pull the last 4 quarters of pipeline data (created, stage changes, close dates, amounts) and check for stage-skipping, stale opens, and sandbagging patterns
• Audit CRM required-field compliance — what % of closed-won/closed-lost deals have complete loss reasons, competitor fields, next steps
• Pull forecast-vs-actual for the last 4 quarters at the rep, manager, and org level — calculate variance %
• Read the last 20 win/loss reports (or run them if none exist) — look for a pattern in why deals are lost, not just that they were
• Get the current comp plan document and quota-setting methodology in writing — do not rely on verbal explanation
• Get the current territory/account assignment map and the rule set (if any) behind it
• Inventory the full tech stack: CRM, sales engagement, conversation intelligence, forecasting, comp management, CPQ — note what's actually used vs. paid-for-and-ignored
• Pull org chart with tenure, quota attainment history (trailing 4 quarters), and any documented PIPs

People — 1:1 discovery (same script for every rep)

Run a 45-minute 1:1 with every rep and first-line manager. Ask the same nine questions, in this order, and write down answers verbatim — you are building a comparison table, not having nine different conversations.

1. Walk me through your top 3 deals right now — where are they really stuck?
2. What's the one thing that, if fixed, would most improve your number this quarter?
3. What does a normal week look like for you, hour by hour?
4. Where do you spend time that doesn't feel like it should be yours?
5. What's confusing or unclear about how you're paid or measured?
6. Who on this team would you want to shadow, and why?
7. What's the last piece of coaching you got that actually changed how you sell?
8. If you were me, what's the first thing you'd fix?
9. Is there anything about this team or company you think I don't know yet and should?

Cross-functional discovery

Run the same style of structured 1:1 with:

• Marketing lead — lead quality, lead volume trend, MQL-to-opportunity conversion, campaign-to-pipeline attribution confidence
• Customer Success / Renewals lead — churn reasons, expansion motion (or lack of it), handoff quality from sales
• Finance/RevOps — how quota is set, how comp is modeled, what the board actually sees, CAC and payback as currently calculated
• Product — roadmap items sales is over-promising or under-selling
• Your boss / the board sponsor — what does "this hire worked out" look like in writing, by when

Deliverable at end of Phase 1

• One-page "State of the Business" memo: pipeline health, forecast accuracy, team capability distribution, tooling gaps, top 3 hypotheses for what's broken — written, but not yet acted on

---

Phase 2 — Days 31-60: Diagnose & Prioritize

Now you test your Phase 1 hypotheses against real deal and call data.

• Run a deal-level pipeline review on every open deal above [threshold] — same rubric for every deal: is the stage accurate, is there a validated next step with a date, is there an economic buyer confirmed
• Set and hit a personal call/recording review quota (minimum 15-20 calls across the team) — score against a fixed rubric, not gut feel
• Build a forecast accuracy scorecard by rep and manager — commit vs. best-case vs. actual, over the last 4 quarters
• Run a talent calibration exercise: plot every rep on a 2x2 of current performance (trailing quota attainment) vs. demonstrated skill in call reviews — the quadrant a rep lands in (not just their number) tells you who's under-supported vs. who's a genuine risk
• Identify the 2-3 systemic issues showing up across multiple 1:1s, multiple deals, AND the data (triangulate — don't act on a single source)
• Map each systemic issue to a root cause: is it skill, process, tooling, comp incentive, or territory/account fit
• Draft a prioritized fix list ranked by (a) evidence strength, (b) blast radius if wrong, (c) reversibility

The "Do Not Touch Yet" list

Do not change any of the following until the stated condition is met — these are the highest blast-radius, least-reversible levers a new leader has:

---

Phase 3 — Days 61-90: Act & Commit

• Select 1-2 "quick wins" — fixes that are high-confidence, low blast-radius, and visible to the team within 2 weeks (e.g., a broken lead routing rule, a missing battlecard, a forecast call cadence fix)
• Ship exactly one process change this phase — not three. Announce it with the evidence behind it ("here's what I saw in 40 calls and 60 deals")
• If comp or territory change is warranted, do not announce it yet — build the readiness gate: written rationale, modeled impact on every individual rep's OTE, a dispute-resolution process, and sign-off from Finance/HR
• Deliver your 90-day plan to your boss/board: what you found, what you fixed, what you're proposing next quarter, and what you need from them
• Set your cadence going forward: weekly 1:1 rhythm, pipeline review cadence, forecast call cadence, call-review quota — in writing, so the team knows what "normal" looks like under you

---

30/60/90 Manager-Up Report Template

30-day update

• What I found (data + people, one paragraph each)
• Top 3 hypotheses I'm testing
• What I have NOT changed yet, and why

60-day update

• What the diagnosis phase confirmed or killed from my Day 30 hypotheses
• Talent calibration summary (no names needed at board level — cohort view)
• The 1-2 structural changes I'm proposing for next quarter, with the evidence

90-day update

• What I shipped and the early read on it
• The comp/territory/headcount decision(s) I'm making next quarter and the readiness plan
• What I need from you/the board to succeed (budget, headcount, air cover)

---

Red flags to watch for during all three phases

• Reps who give identical, rehearsed answers in 1:1s — usually means the team has been burned by a prior leader's "open door" that wasn't
• A forecast that's too accurate quarter over quarter — often means sandbagging, not skill
• A comp plan nobody can explain the same way twice
• Win/loss data that's 90%+ "price" as the loss reason — almost never the real reason; a sign no one has done real loss analysis